Transaction Details
Transaction Hash:
0x9b
0f73165183fc0ed1a9fc5473a61c7485a865a05cd2036b5ed3d5cb7b4f
3a80
Status:
Success
Block:
19489290
Finalized
Timestamp:
2024-03-22 09:31:23 +0000 UTC
From:
0x9e0e9D…5257B1
nekofar.eth
Interacted With:
Contract
- Transfer 0.00342513 ETH From 0x5d2C31…854039 To nekofar.eth
Value:
0 ETH
0.00 ETH
Transaction Fee:
0.00454945 ETH
0.00 ETH
Effective Gas Price:
25.82026603 GWei
Execution Stats:
Used
176197
out of
202009
Gas
(87%)
Gas Fees:
Base Block Fee:
25.81025620 GWei
|
Max Overall Fee:
36.13955278 GWei
|
Max Priority Fee:
0.01000983 GWei
Attributes:
Txn Type: 2 (EIP-1559)
Nonce: 273
Block Position: 176
Call Data:
Address:
Name:
VoteCast(address indexed voter, uint256 proposalId, uint8 support, uint256 votes, string reason)
Topics:
| 0 | 0xb8e138887d0aa13bab447e82de9d5c1777041ecd21ca36ba824ff1e6c07ddda4 |
|---|---|
| 1 | 0x0000000000000000000000009e0e9d25a5ed9bc773f91691f0b45599255257b1 |
Data (Decoded):
| proposalId | uint256 |
191
|
|---|---|---|
| reason | string |
At its core, the proposal suggests a shift towards centralized representation, which diverges from the ethos of our DAO that emphasizes decentralization and the collective voice. Our current standing within the ecosystem, solely maintained through voting with `metagov.lilnouns.eth`, signifies our active participation and influence. Eliminating or altering this practice could metaphorically erase our presence, undermining the contributions and investments we've made to fortify our position within the community.
To date, our DAO has invested hundreds of ETH in developing tools and acquiring Nouns to support our infrastructure and community initiatives. This investment reflects our commitment to fostering a vibrant and dynamic ecosystem, emphasizing the importance of maintaining our autonomy and voice in governance decisions. The proposed delegation to `sewerpipe.eth` raises concerns about diluting this commitment and potentially sidelining the broader community's interests in favor of a singular perspective.
Moreover, the argument presented, centered on improving vote quality and participation through centralized delegation, overlooks the intrinsic value of diverse participation and the broad spectrum of perspectives within our community. The claim of enhancing value through concentrated voting fails to account for the richness of decentralized decision-making processes, where each member's input contributes to a more holistic and inclusive outcome.
Additionally, the proposal's rationale, which cites personal contributions and a high voting record as the basis for delegation, does not align with the principles of equal representation and collective decision-making. While individual contributions are invaluable, they should not predicate the centralization of voting power, especially when it contradicts the foundational ethos of our DAO.
The proposal also hints at a perceived inefficiency in the current voting process, suggesting that a more centralized approach could streamline decision-making. However, this perspective undervalues the democratic processes that ensure each decision reflects the collective will and interests of the DAO, rather than the viewpoints of a select few.
In light of these considerations, it is crucial for our DAO to remain steadfast in its commitment to decentralized governance, collective representation, and the inclusive participation of all members. Any move towards centralizing voting power not only detracts from these principles but also risks diminishing the sense of community and shared purpose that has been the hallmark of our collective efforts.
|
| support | uint8 |
0
|
| voter | address | |
| votes | uint256 |
54
|
Data (Hex):
| Type Trace Address | From | To | Value | Gas Limit |
|---|